We are data aggregators, not analysts. We do not forecast crop production or price direction. What we can do is describe what a heavy abandonment cycle has looked like in the observable data — condition ratings, drought coverage, positioning shifts — and note that the current 2026 setup is tracking closely with the 2023 crop year at this point in the calendar. The 2023 crop ended with significant HRW abandonment and harvested acres well below planted. We are watching to see if 2026 follows the same data trajectory.
Wheat abandonment is the gap between acres planted in fall and acres harvested the following summer. Historically, a baseline of planted acreage is abandoned annually due to winterkill, disease, flooding, or localized drought. In a standard production cycle, this historical baseline ranges between 10% and 15% of total planted area. In a heavy abandonment year the gap widens dramatically, sometimes to 30–40% or more in the worst states.
The important thing about abandonment is when the data confirms it. Planting numbers come from the USDA Prospective Plantings report in March, confirmed by the June 30 Acreage report. But harvested acres are not confirmed until the NASS Small Grains Summary in September. The July WASDE, the first one anchored by the FSS small grains harvest survey, is historically where the most significant abandonment adjustments appear. What happens between now and July is a sequence of observable signals that precede the official survey — and those signals are exactly what this page is tracking.
The leading indicators that matter:
1. NASS Crop Condition Ratings — weekly, April through early July. The proportion of acres rated Very Poor or Poor relative to Good or Excellent is the clearest in-season signal of crop health. Sustained deterioration through May and June is characteristic of abandonment years.
2. US Drought Monitor Coverage — weekly, for the relevant production belt. D2 (Severe) and above is the threshold where crop-damaging moisture stress persists long enough to affect yield and survival.
3. Managed Money Positioning — CFTC COT, weekly. Specs move before official data. The timing and magnitude of positioning shifts ahead of WASDE and harvest survey releases is informative.
4. USDA Crop Progress: Headed and Harvested Acres — once harvest begins in Texas in June, the pace of harvested-area reports relative to prior years reveals ground-level abandonment before the survey counts it.
The 2022–23 winter wheat crop is the most useful reference because it tracked the same early data path that 2026 is following now: a drought-stressed fall emergence, sustained spring drought, and condition ratings deteriorating from the upper twenties through the critical grain fill window.
US National Winter Wheat Good-to-Excellent (G/E) rating, weekly NASS Crop Progress. Each line represents one crop year plotted on its actual calendar dates. After two recovery years — 2023–24 at 47–56% G/E and 2024–25 at 45–54% G/E — the 2025–26 crop has collapsed back below 2022–23 spring levels. Note: G/E ratings typically rise through June–July even in bad years as poor-condition and abandoned acres are harvested first, removing them from the reporting pool (harvest artifact). The 2022–23 rise from 31% in late May to 40% by July reflects this — not crop improvement. Source: USDA NASS.
The chart above is the single most useful data layer for this question. The 2025–26 crop emerged in fall 2025 at 45–48% G/E — a much better start than the 2022–23 crop, which opened at 28–34%. But conditions collapsed through the winter and spring drought, falling from 35% in early April to 26% G/E nationally as of May 24. That is actually worse than where the 2022–23 crop stood at this same calendar point — the 2022–23 crop was at 31% in late May and trending higher, carried by the harvest artifact (as poor fields are abandoned or harvested first, they exit the reporting pool, mechanically lifting the remaining sample's rating). The 2025–26 crop is declining toward 26% from a weaker base. After two consecutive recovery years, the collapse is sharper in relative terms.
The national average obscures the state-level distribution. The HRW belt (Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Nebraska, Colorado, South Dakota) carries the bulk of the abandonment risk. Nationally, the soft red winter (SRW) belt states — Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri — are largely insulated from drought. That distinction matters enormously for understanding why Chicago wheat (SRW) and Kansas City wheat (HRW) are positioned very differently right now.
Nebraska's 4% Good-to-Excellent with 95% drought coverage is the most extreme state-level reading in the current dataset — essentially no crop in reportable condition. Nebraska is not the largest HRW producing state — Kansas typically carries three to four times Nebraska's production — but at 4% G/E it has no comparable in the recent historical record for this calendar point. The state-level divergence within the HRW belt — Kansas at 15% before exiting the reporting window, Oklahoma at 12%, Texas at 14% — tells you the damage is geographically broad across the entire southern and central belt.
As of May 26, Chicago wheat (SRW) managed money is net short 18,706 contracts — and deepened that short by nearly 14,000 contracts this week. Kansas City wheat (HRW) is net long 26,870 contracts, down from a peak of 37,790 two weeks ago. On the surface this looks contradictory: national conditions are at 2023 lows, abandonment risk is elevated, and yet specs are net short on Chicago?
The answer is in the belt geography. Chicago wheat prices are primarily driven by the SRW belt states: Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Kentucky, Michigan. That belt is not under drought. Ohio has 0% drought coverage. Indiana is at 14% total drought with essentially none at D2+. When managed money evaluates the SRW short, they are not looking at Kansas. They are evaluating moisture balances in Ohio and Indiana, which are largely fine.
The Kansas City spec long is a different trade — it is pricing the HRW supply risk specifically. The KC–Chicago spread (the quality and class premium of hard red winter over soft red winter) is where the abandonment thesis lives. If HRW abandonment materializes, the KC premium to Chicago would be expected to widen — and spec positioning is broadly aligned with that structural view.
HRW (KC) and SRW (Chicago) managed money net positions, weekly CFTC Disaggregated COT. The KC–Chicago positioning divergence reflects belt-specific drought conditions rather than a single national view on wheat supply.
The HRW belt drought (D2+ coverage averaged across Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, Nebraska, South Dakota) tells a specific seasonal story in 2026: drought conditions were near zero in summer 2025, accelerated sharply through winter, peaked in mid-April at 58.7% D2+ coverage, and have since moderated slightly to 53.1%.
The timing of this stress acceleration is critical. The April 14 peak at 58.7% hit the southern belt during or immediately prior to jointing—the specific vegetative and early reproductive phase where moisture deficits directly dictate head development, potential yield caps, and ultimate tillering survival. By May, when stress should ease as temperatures warm and the crop matures, the HRW belt was still carrying more than 53% at Severe drought or worse.
HRW belt D2+ (Severe drought or worse) weekly average across KS, OK, TX, CO, NE, SD. Source: US Drought Monitor. The April peak of 58.7% occurred during the critical jointing-to-heading window for winter wheat in the southern belt.
For context: in 2023, the HRW belt drought peaked around 50–55% D2+ in spring before harvest. The 2026 trajectory peaked slightly higher and earlier. The key remaining question is whether any meaningful precipitation relief arrives before harvest is complete — which typically runs Texas through May, Oklahoma through June, Kansas through July. Any sustained precipitation in late June in Kansas could change the harvested-acre picture at the margin.
Abandonment does not arrive in a single number. It accumulates across a sequence of data releases over several months. Here is the order in which the observable signals typically appear:
We are not saying 2026 will replicate 2023. Conditions can and do improve with late rains. Kansas has received late-season precipitation rescues before that partially offset drought damage. The May WASDE already cut US winter wheat production 25% and HRW down 36% — some supply reduction is already priced. Global supply conditions and export competition from Black Sea and EU producers also matter enormously for where prices settle.
What we are saying is that the observable data — condition ratings, drought coverage, and the pace of seasonal deterioration — is following the same pattern that preceded significant abandonment in 2023. We are watching to see whether the subsequent data releases follow the same path, or whether conditions improve enough to diverge from the 2023 trajectory. The July WASDE is the fulcrum.
SoftSignal Research publishes weekly grain positioning reports with drought overlay, condition tracking, and COT data — plus MCP access for AI-assisted analysis.
Explore Reports